San Diego City Council to hear ‘updated’ Complete Communities proposal Nov. 9

An illustration from San Diego's Complete Communities website shows elements of the initiative.
(City of San Diego)

The San Diego City Council has scheduled a special online meeting for 11 a.m. Monday, Nov. 9, to review and take action on the city’s Complete Communities proposal, which is touted as a way to “create incentives to build homes near transit, provide more mobility choices and enhance opportunities for places to walk, bike, relax and play.”

An Oct. 27 news release announcing the meeting stated that the city’s efforts to incorporate public input had pushed back the City Council’s consideration of the proposal but improved the plan overall.

“Although we were on track to move forward to City Council in the early summer following several months of public review, we spent the summer and fall incorporating changes into the programs because we wanted to make sure we took the time to fully address comments we received,” city Planning Director Mike Hansen said in the release.

The integrated program has been developed by the San Diego Planning Department and has four components: a Parks Master Plan, a mobility choices initiative, a housing solutions plan and facilities financing.

“After incorporating public input, the housing solutions program now proposes the city’s strongest affordable housing program for mixed-income projects and the city’s most protective anti-displacement and tenant protection policies,” the release stated. “The mobility choices program now proposes even greater focus on delivering infrastructure improvements in communities of concern. The Play Everywhere program now places greater emphasis on land acquisition for new parks and proposes a new urban watershed park typology.”

In the past year, the plan has fallen under scrutiny by several community advisory groups for its perceived lack of public outreach.

The Pacific Beach Planning Group sent a letter to city officials dated Oct. 1 summarizing motions it passed at its September meeting regarding Complete Communities.

The group asked that the city wait to docket the Complete Communities plans “until the housing and infrastructure portions have been fully developed and reviewed by all stakeholders, including community planning groups.” It also requested time for the public to review changes that have been made.

Some are worried that Complete Communities will alter development regulations in coastal areas and increase density through what some opponents have called a “developer’s grab.”

Among other concerns with the proposal, critics say the Parks Master Plan is being rushed through for approval, which would lay the foundation for the housing component. Further, they say the housing component is being justified by a potential transportation element that has not yet been implemented.

An early concern with the plan was that it would not yield one of the stated goals — affordable housing — in the coastal zone and that any loosening of restrictions would actually yield luxury housing.

The Pacific Beach Planning Group’s letter supported increased affordable housing requirements, especially in the coastal zone, where it said “even smaller market-rate units are not ‘affordable’ and smaller units in these areas are more likely to be rented out for short-term rentals instead of for longer-term housing.”

Other critics worried that the plan calls for an increase to the allowable floor area ratio (the square footage of a property in relation to its lot) up to 4.0, whereas the Pacific Beach Planning Group and other coastal community boards want to keep it at or below 2. Some also are concerned about whether the 30-foot building height limit in coastal communities would remain.

The proposal has been heard by City Council subcommittees and affiliated groups since fall 2019. In June, the San Diego Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend adoption of the Parks Master Plan component with a list of more than 20 items to be clarified.

Also in June, the San Diego Land Use and Housing Committee moved to forward the housing solutions and mobility choices components to the full City Council without a recommendation and to “direct staff to work with community stakeholders ... to try and improve on some of the policies that were of note,” said committee Chairman Chris Ward. The motion passed 3-1, with Councilman Mark Kersey opposed, saying “it just isn’t ready.”

At Land Use and Housing, Councilwoman Jennifer Campbell voiced concern about the time given to review everything and said she “hates to see this move so fast,” though she agreed to forward the proposal to the council.

At the council’s special meeting Nov. 9, members of the public may participate online and provide comment via phone, webform, email or mail. To learn more, go to and under “City Hall,” click on “Council meetings.”

— PB Monthly Editor Rob Vardon contributed to this report.